Key Points

  • SpaceX is set to shatter records today, June 12, with the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history.

  • Structural changes ahead of the SpaceX IPO can eventually lead to a fleecing of retail investors.

  • Furthermore, history hasn’t been kind to mega-IPOs or public companies with otherworldly valuations.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Space Exploration Technologies ›

The big day has arrived! In a matter of hours, Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence (AI) and space economy conglomerate, SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX), will make its debut and cement itself as the largest initial public offering (IPO) in Wall Street’s storied history.

SpaceX’s debut also starts the clock on its entrance into the technology-driven Nasdaq-100, and the Russell 1000 and Russell 3000 indexes. Although the committee overseeing additions to the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) chose not to amend the rules governing index inclusion, changes to the Nasdaq-100 and Russell Equity Index Series inclusion methodology can fast-track SpaceX’s entrance into these indexes after 15 (Nasdaq-100) and five (Russell Equity Index Series) trading sessions.

Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

A twenty dollar bill paper airplane that's crashed and crumpled into a financial newspaper.

Image source: Getty Images.

But while retail investor enthusiasm surrounding this IPO is thick enough to cut with a knife, there’s an equally long list of justifications why SpaceX stock should be avoided like the plague. There are seven reasons, comprising structural, operational, valuation, and historical components, why SpaceX has no business in my (or your) investment portfolio.

1. Structural protections were removed, paving the way for insiders to cash out

Arguably, the most glaring warning with the SpaceX IPO is the aforementioned structural changes to index inclusion, coupled with the company’s unorthodox lockup period.

Fast entry into the Nasdaq-100, Russell 1000, and Russell 3000 will force index funds to spend tens of billions of dollars purchasing SpaceX shares shortly after its debut. Given that SpaceX is selling only a little over 4% of its outstanding shares (notably lower than the 10% to 20% observed with most IPOs), this forced purchasing by index funds will gobble up a substantial portion of the initial float and could artificially boost its share price.

This artificial share price boost coincides with an accelerated lockup period for most insiders. Excluding Elon Musk, insiders can begin selling a portion of their shares as soon as the second trading day after SpaceX’s first quarterly report in August. This unique lockup period, the company’s low float, and the removal of investor protections to fast-track SpaceX into several major indexes should facilitate a wealth transfer from retail investors to insiders as they cash out.

2. It’s a capital-intensive business with little margin for error

Although SpaceX is the sum of several parts — reusable rockets, satellite-based broadband services (Starlink), AI start-up xAI, and social media platform X — many of its operating segments are highly capital-intensive and have virtually no margin for error.

For instance, building rockets and satellites is costly and time-consuming. The inflationary effects of higher production costs, launch delays, and rapid unscheduled disassembly (the fancy phrase for when a rocket or satellite crashes or explodes) can pummel a capital-intensive business like SpaceX.

Additionally, SpaceX is spending a small fortune to expand its AI data center compute. Though it’s announced two notable compute contracts in recent weeks from Anthropic and Alphabet, SpaceX’s xAI division has been spending far more than it’s generating in sales.

3. SpaceX is losing money hand over fist

This brings me to the next logical reason to avoid the SpaceX IPO like the plague: the company is losing a lot of money!

While its mile-long prospectus highlighted several consecutive years of positive adjusted EBITDA, this represents nothing more than a smoke-and-mirrors attempt to mask steep operating losses. Last year, Musk’s company lost nearly $2.6 billion from operations and spent close to $1.95 billion on interest expenses. All told, its net loss surpassed $4.9 billion.

SpaceX is unlikely to be profitable anytime soon, which is an absurd statement for a company expected to slide in ahead of Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) as the eighth-most-valuable publicly traded business on U.S. exchanges.

4. The valuation can’t be justified

While the aforementioned structural changes will force index funds to purchase SpaceX stock over the next few weeks, there’s zero fundamental justification for the company’s IPO valuation of $1.77 trillion.

History tells us that no company at the forefront of a game-changing trend over the last three decades has been able to maintain a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio above 30. SpaceX is going public at 95 times its reported sales of $18.67 billion last year. Even with sizable monthly compute deals from Anthropic and Alphabet now in place, SpaceX’s P/S ratio is firmly in bubble territory.

We’ve also never witnessed a public company reach trillion-dollar status without recurring profitability. Musk’s other trillion-dollar company, Tesla, is arguably the least consistent of all trillion-dollar companies. Nevertheless, it’s been persistently profitable on a full-year basis for more than half a decade.

A calculator and pen set atop corporate income statements and balance sheets.

Image source: Getty Images.

5. Elon Musk has a terrible habit of overpromising and underdelivering

Another reason investors can confidently avoid the SpaceX IPO is its CEO, Elon Musk. While Musk successfully turned Tesla into a trillion-dollar company, his track record shows a lengthy history of overpromising and underdelivering.

For example, Musk has been opining for more than a decade that Tesla’s AI-powered full self-driving (FSD) software is “one year away” from Level 5 autonomy. Despite this ongoing claim, Tesla’s FSD hasn’t moved beyond Level 2. Musk also promised 1 million robotaxis on public roads by the end of 2020 (which never materialized) and has touted his company’s line of Optimus humanoid robots, which aren’t generating direct sales for Tesla.

If investors take the time to separate Musk’s facts from his as-of-now fictional claims, they’ll discover that most of his promises and forecasts have gone unfulfilled. If these unfulfilled promises are backed out of his company’s valuations, SpaceX and Tesla could tumble.

6. Mega tech IPOs have mostly flopped since the early 2010s

Historical precedent suggests that retail investors steer clear of the SpaceX IPO, as well. According to research by Truist Financial analysts, an overwhelming majority of big tech IPOs since 2012 have fallen flat in their first year as public companies.

Recently, Truist analyzed the performance of 30 large-scale tech-driven IPOs since Facebook (now Meta Platforms) went public in May 2012. Truist uncovered an average year-one drawdown of 55% among these high-profile IPOs. Furthermore, just 43% were positive six months after their respective debuts.

Saudi Aramco, which held the title of largest global IPO until SpaceX went public, declined by 15% six months after its debut. Once investor euphoria fades after a couple of weeks, most brand-name IPOs struggle.

7. Investors persistently overestimate next-big-thing technologies

Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, professional and everyday investors have persistently overestimated the adoption and/or optimization rate of next-big-thing technologies for more than three decades.

AI and the space economy are two of the hottest trends on Wall Street. PwC analysts foresee AI creating $15.7 trillion in global economic value by 2030, while the analysts at McKinsey & Company predict the space economy can create $1.8 trillion in economic value by 2035. While the adoption of AI and space infrastructure hasn’t been an issue, optimization certainly appears to be one.

We’re likely several years away from AI solutions and the space economy optimizing sales and profits for corporate America. In other words, investors are repeating the same mistakes they made with the internet, nanotechnology, 3D printing, blockchain technology, the metaverse, and so on.

SpaceX is the poster child for a next-big-thing bubble-bursting event, making it a stock that should be avoided like the plague.

Should you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies right now?

Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $438,283!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,257,427!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 938% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 12, 2026.

Sean Williams has positions in Alphabet and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Tesla, and Truist Financial. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.



Source link

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or legal advice. Stock markets, real estate, and other financial instruments involve significant risks, and past performance does not guarantee future results. You should conduct your own research and/or seek advice from a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The website owner is not liable for any financial losses or damages arising from the use of the information presented here.

About The Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *